X (Twitter) has failed to remove racist posts containing the N-word and P-word directed at UK politicians like Kemi Badenoch, despite repeated reports under the 'hate, abuse or harassment' category. Users accuse the platform of inaction, with some arguing that X only takes action when posts are reported as illegal under the UK’s Online Safety Act, restricting visibility in the UK but not globally. Others claim X is intentionally allowing racism to persist for business reasons, while some question the severity of the P-word compared to the N-word.

Prox argues that using 'n-word' and 'p-word' in news articles without spelling out the slurs is problematic, as it obscures the full impact of the hate speech. DarkCloud highlights that the P-word is a derogatory term for South Asians in the UK, often used with violent intent, and that discussing such slurs openly is necessary for cultural progress. DarrinBrunner insists that spelling out slurs in news articles is necessary to convey their full impact, as bots and automated systems can't understand context. NOT_RICK notes that the P-word is a regional racial slur common in the UK, used against South Asians, and is not as severe as the N-word but still deeply offensive. Hiatus compares X's inaction to Reddit's protection of pedophiles and abusers, highlighting a broader issue of platform accountability.

The community consensus is that X has failed to address racist posts targeting UK politicians, with sharp divides over the severity of the P-word and the platform's motives. While some argue for transparency in reporting hate speech, others question the effectiveness of current moderation policies. The weight of opinion points to a growing frustration with platform accountability and the need for more robust action against hate speech.