Toy Story 5: Critics Blast Pixar's Next Chapter as 'Run of the Mill' While Fans Question Disney's Profit Motive
The discourse centers on the trailer for the *Toy Story 5* sequel, fueling debate around the creative longevity of the franchise under Pixar/Disney's watch.
The commentary splits sharply. Some attack the film's quality, with M137 dismissing it as merely 'another run of the mill 3d animated movie,' while SamuraiBeandog suggests the series is past its peak, or has 'jump[s] the shark.' Conversely, others attack the business model itself. JohnnyEnzyme questioned the existence of the film, demanding to know if this was for 'Pixar and Disney stockholders?' ParadoxSeahorse added a dig at the brand's physical decay, noting how 'shit they’re all dead and buried' merchandise is.
The overriding mood is profound skepticism. There is no consensus on quality, but the weight of opinion suggests deep doubt regarding the sequel's artistic necessity and its continued viability given the state of the associated physical merchandise lines.
Key Points
The sequel lacks artistic merit and feels creatively stagnant.
M137 stated the film 'doesn't look as good, both story and style' compared to Toy Story 4.
The film’s existence is primarily driven by corporate profit, not artistic value.
JohnnyEnzyme challenged the premise by questioning the role of 'Pixar and Disney stockholders?'
The franchise may have peaked and is past its creative prime.
SamuraiBeandog argued the sequel suggests the franchise 'jump[s] the shark.'
The physical toy line accompanying the franchise is declining.
ParadoxSeahorse pointed out the commercial contradiction: 'It’s a shame the licensed toys are so shit they’re all dead and buried.'
The fundamental need for the sequel is questionable.
lukalix98 voiced outright doubt with the query, 'Who even asked for this?'
Source Discussions (3)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.