Proton Launches Linux Client for Drive, Sparking Debate Over Performance and Politics
Proton announced it is actively developing a Linux client for Proton Drive, marking a major shift for Linux users who previously relied on workarounds like Syncthing. The move has generated both excitement and skepticism within the community.
Supporters like excursion22 praised the development as a significant step forward, while others like rmerc warned of potential server overload from homelabbers syncing data. Concerns about Proton's political affiliations and transparency were also raised, with NGC2346 citing past performance issues as a reason for leaving the service. drdiddlybadger emphasized the need for a native Linux client, not an Electron-based one, and Wolfram noted that improved performance could make Proton Drive more viable with rclone.
The community largely agrees that Proton is making progress with the Linux client, but there are clear fault lines over performance risks, political influence, and user experience. While some see the development as a positive step, others remain wary of potential issues that could affect the service's reliability and independence.
Key Points
#1Proton is actively building a Linux client for Proton Drive
excursion22 confirmed Proton's announcement in an email, highlighting it as a major development for Linux users.
#2Performance concerns over server overload
rmerc warned that homelabbers syncing data could overwhelm Proton's servers.
#3Skepticism about Proton's political affiliations
Commenters raised concerns about the company's transparency and potential political influence.
#4Call for a native Linux client
drdiddlybadger argued that a CLI is useful, but a native client with good UX is preferred and should not be Electron-based.
Source Discussions (3)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.