Natural Deep Red Hair Is Rare, But Not Impossible — Users Debate Genetics and Perception
Natural deep red hair in adults is considered rare, with most commenters agreeing it's less common than orange or coppery shades. Some argue that scarlet or cherry red tones are virtually nonexistent in natural hair, while others claim they've encountered individuals with such hair, suggesting it's possible but uncommon.
The discussion highlights a divide: TheJesusaurus asserts that natural red hair typically has an orangey hue, and scarlet tones are not common. Alexander1999 counters that some people have seen natural deep red hair in adults, though it's less frequent. Dsilverz adds a genetic angle, noting that the balance of eumelanin and pheomelanin required for deep red hair is statistically rare and may be linked to other traits like zygomatic rubor. GrayBackgroundMusic and altphoto suggest that natural deep red hair is often mistaken for dyed hair.
The consensus leans toward deep red hair being rare and genetically uncommon, with some acknowledging its existence but emphasizing its scarcity. The debate underscores the interplay between genetics, perception, and the role of dye in achieving deep red tones.
Key Points
#1Natural deep red hair is less common than orange or coppery shades.
TheJesusaurus and others note that scarlet or cherry red tones are not commonly found in natural hair.
#2Some individuals claim to have encountered natural deep red hair in adults.
Alexander1999 reports seeing such hair, though it's considered less frequent.
#3Genetic factors make deep red hair statistically rare.
Dsilverz explains that the balance of eumelanin and pheomelanin required for deep red hair is uncommon.
#4Natural deep red hair is often mistaken for dyed hair.
GrayBackgroundMusic and altphoto suggest that people frequently assume deep red hair is artificially colored.
Source Discussions (3)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.