Judges Strike Down Trump Orders on Voter ID and Mail Ballots; States Keep Election Power
Federal judges blocked President Trump's efforts via executive order to mandate requirements like documentary proof of US citizenship for voter registration and dictate mail ballot handling rules.
Commenters reported that the judicial block established that election authority belongs to states and Congress, not the President. Users cited the ruling multiple times, noting that figures like Trevor Potter stated no president controls election processes. Wamau123 and MicroWave specifically highlighted that the Constitution assigns this power away from the executive branch.
The weight of the report shows a clear consensus: federal judicial action invalidated the President’s attempts to legislate election procedures. The fault line rests on the perceived constitutional authority of the executive branch versus the established power of state and federal legislatures.
Key Points
#1Judges found parts of Trump's executive orders unconstitutional.
Specific rulings blocked mandates regarding proof of citizenship for voter registration and mail ballot rules (thelastaxolotl, Stamau123)
#2Election authority rests with states and Congress, not the President.
This was the core legal argument repeated by multiple sources, including the Campaign Legal Center's Trevor Potter and Washington AG Nick Brown.
#3The blocking covered specific procedures.
Challenges targeted both proof of citizenship requirements and specific rules for handling mail-in ballots, notably in Washington and Oregon (Stamau123, MicroWave).
#4Multiple legal confirmations reinforce the jurisdictional boundary.
Sources cited multiple instances of judicial action (Judge Kollar-Kotelly, Judge John H. Chun) confirming the separation of powers regarding elections.
Source Discussions (3)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.