Dolphin vs. Terminal: Why Linux File Managers Aren't Just Windows Clones Anymore
The focus centers on advancing Linux file management, with Dolphin (KDE Plasma File Explorer) repeatedly mentioned for its advanced, built-in features, such as open terminal access and split windows.
Opinions are sharply divided between demanding Windows-level parity and embracing native Linux paradigms. Arcanoloth tells critics who complain about Windows comparisons to manage their expectations. Countering this, blackbrook points to Dolphin's existing capabilities, citing features like SFTP browsing. The debate also touches on technical bottlenecks: jlsalvador suggests the problem isn't ideas, but programmer capacity and technical debt. Meanwhile, users like Freakazoid prefer raw speed from terminal-based tools like Yazi.
The community recognizes that improvement requires more than complaints. MentalEdge bluntly demands users contribute code or even fund development rather than just filing feature requests. The consensus points toward Dolphin's robust feature set, but the critical mass of opinion suggests that substantial development effort, not just critique, is needed to bridge perceived gaps.
Key Points
Dolphin possesses numerous advanced features contradicting common complaints.
blackbrook lists features like open terminal access, split windows, and SFTP browsing as evidence of Dolphin's capability.
Demanding Windows parity is unrealistic and lacks empathy for the platform's reality.
Arcanoloth tells users making feature requests to adjust their expectations regarding similarity to Windows.
Feature requests are useless without real development contribution.
MentalEdge argues users must contribute code, offer money, or organize development instead of just submitting requests.
The biggest blocker for file manager features is programmer availability, not idea generation.
jlsalvador states the bottleneck is limited programmers and existing technical debt.
Some users prioritize raw speed over graphical feature depth.
Freakazoid favors fast, terminal-based managers like Yazi, noting its plugin system.
Source Discussions (3)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.