Crisis Level: Can Rising Living Standards Temper Revolutionary Fever, or is Collapse Inevitable?
Revolution demands a national crisis that paralyzes the ruling class, making the current system functionally unsustainable.
Opinions split sharply on the probability of such a collapse. Comrade_Improving insists that severe governmental failure is the mandatory trigger. Conversely, Commiejones argues that improving material standards deflate the revolutionary impetus, suggesting current desperation levels do not mirror pre-Soviet or pre-Chinese eras. Red_Scare anchors this critique to desperation itself, stating that higher living standards mean people are 'not desperate enough, haven’t ripened for it yet.'
The core consensus hinges on crisis severity. While an undeniable consensus points to the need for systemic failure, the fault line remains whether improved material conditions raise the threshold for violent action, or if the internal rot of the system guarantees a breakthrough regardless of current comfort.
Key Points
Revolution requires the ruling class to functionally fail.
Comrade_Improving argues collapse must be severe enough that the existing system cannot maintain control.
Material prosperity dampens revolutionary fervor.
Red_Scare claims that rising living standards increase the necessary desperation threshold for upheaval.
Current stability reduces the likelihood of immediate upheaval.
Commiejones suggests that rising material standards mean current suffering is not equivalent to historical tipping points in places like Russia or China.
Revolution hinges on a crisis affecting both oppressed and oppressors.
Confidant6198 posits that the trigger requires a simultaneous crisis hitting both segments of society.
Source Discussions (4)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.