ASL Outflanks Finger Math: Why Simple Binary Counting Can't Compete With Structured Language Systems
American Sign Language (ASL) is detailed as a functional, structured system capable of counting past 999 using explicit place markers for higher numbers.
The field splits between pure mathematical theory and physical feasibility. Some argue the theoretical ceiling for finger counting is massive, citing numbers like 1,073,741,824. Others counter with physical critiques, questioning if the system accurately handles consecutive numbers (like 99 vs. 100). Suggestions range from mimicking base-10 structures using both hands (cerebralhawks) to exploring ternary systems using finger joints (Multiplexer).
The consensus is that the entire concept is fundamentally a parlor trick lacking everyday utility. The fault lines exist between the intellectual appeal of abstract mathematics versus the proven, functional complexity of real-world systems like ASL.
Key Points
#1ASL offers superior, structured counting capabilities.
AliasVortex showed ASL utilizes place markers ('C' for hundreds) for reliable counting far beyond simple finger binary capacity.
#2Theoretical limits ignore biomechanical roadblocks.
Debate pits the abstract potential (e.g., 'You can only get to 1023') against real-world usability issues.
#3Alternate counting systems are proposed.
Suggestions include base-10 structuring with two hands (cerebralhawks) or using finger joints for base-12 counting (olafurp).
#4The primary critique targets practical application.
lvxferre noted that while remembering powers of two is possible, the actual conversion from finger pattern to base-10 number is needlessly difficult.
Source Discussions (3)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.