ACP Puppets Removed From r/TankieTheDeprogram After Alleged Takeover by u/Alexitine and Co.
The subreddit r/TankieTheDeprogram experienced an alleged ideological takeover orchestrated by ACP-affiliated moderators, specifically naming u/Alexitine and u/FamousPlan101. Community members claim the top moderator compromised the board by promoting pro-ACP content and deleting critical posts.
Commenters are fiercely divided on the fallout. Some, like Ancient_Egg_57, are jubilant, citing the removal of u/Alexitine for alleged fascist ties. Others are skeptical, exemplified by Богданова, who dismissed the whole affair as emotional noise, demanding all evidence consolidate into one single, fact-based thread. There are clear lines drawn between those cheering the 'foiled coup' and those demanding structural proof.
The raw weight of opinion confirms a deep schism. The core belief is that the subreddit was infiltrated by ACP figures. However, the primary fault line is the process itself; some view the moderator removals as victory, while others reject the current methods, demanding a return to rigorous, evidence-backed argumentation.
Key Points
u/Alexitine was compromised and removed due to ACP ties.
Multiple users, including communix and Ancient_Egg_57, accuse the top moderator of fascist sympathies and deep ACP links, leading to admin removal.
The sub was infiltrated by ACP affiliates.
The narrative centers on the infiltration, naming u/FamousPlan101 and u/zombiesingularity as specific, named ACP moderators.
The 'takeover' narrative is poorly presented and emotional.
Богданова repeatedly challenged the community's communication style, demanding all claims be centralized into one objective 'mega thread' instead of scattered posts.
Community action successfully thwarted an ideological coup.
ArcticFoxSmiles frames the outcome as a definitive victory against the supposed 'ACP coup' through collective community awareness.
The accusations require centralized, verifiable evidence.
Богданова explicitly rejected the current discourse, insisting that seriousness requires systematic, fact-based documentation.
Source Discussions (6)
This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.