Abolish ICE Now: Activists Demand Zero Funding as Political Compromise Fails to Contain 'Terrorizing' Agency

Post date: April 9, 2026 · Discovered: April 17, 2026 · 7 posts, 5 comments

Multiple high-profile lawmakers and activists are demanding the complete abolition of ICE. Several key figures argue that the agency inherently violates the law, citing issues like unauthorized detentions and the Fourth Amendment, making any funding dangerously inadequate.

The conversation splits drastically over funding mechanisms. One bloc demands zero funding, with Rep. Rashida Tlaib stating the agency is "terrorizing neighborhoods," and Rep. Ilhan Omar demanding ICE receive "not a single penny." Conversely, others advocate for political compromise, though this has proven contentious; Rep. Rosa DeLauro's noted the current bill "falls short of imposing true accountability." Additionally, discussions surrounding Zionism reveal a sharp divide, pitting those demanding strict anti-Zionist stances against those willing to normalize the ideology.

The overwhelming current consensus pushes for institutional dismantling. The failure to secure robust reforms, coupled with repeated accusations of the agency's overreach, means the political consensus leans heavily toward total defunding or abolition, while the central conflict remains anchored in the differing acceptable levels of political compromise.

Key Points

SUPPORT

ICE must be abolished entirely.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib stated the public sentiment demands abolition because ICE is 'terrorizing neighborhoods.' Rep. Ilhan Omar echoed this, demanding the agency receive 'not a single penny.'

SUPPORT

Funding any form of ICE is illegal and dangerous.

Rep. Chris Murphy argued that because DHS violates law (e.g., detaining children), funding the agency remains a dangerous compromise.

SUPPORT

Zionism must be confronted as an ideology, not compromised with.

Chris Williamson warned that attempting to appease Zionists is a 'catastrophic error,' labeling Zionism an inherently Jewish supremacist ideology.

SUPPORT

The argument against city funding for Israeli actions.

Jay Saper strongly advocated that city funds cannot subsidize Israeli actions, citing the need to prevent underwriting of actions termed 'genocide in Gaza.'

OPPOSE

Political compromises regarding funding are seen as inadequate.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro conceded that current legislative efforts fall short of implementing 'true accountability.'

Source Discussions (7)

This report was synthesized from the following Lemmy discussions, ranked by community score.

74
points
‘Cowardice in the Face of Fascism’: Fury at House Democrats Willing to Fund ICE | Common Dreams
[email protected]·3 comments·1/22/2026·by thelastaxolotl·commondreams.org
68
points
'Grow a F*cking Spine': Critics Fume as Newsom Backtracks on ICE 'Terrorism' in Ben Shapiro Interview | Common Dreams
[email protected]·5 comments·1/17/2026·by thelastaxolotl·commondreams.org
47
points
‘Genocide Is a Bad Investment’: Passover Seder Protests NYC Comptroller Plan to Reinvest in Israel | Common Dreams
[email protected]·0 comments·4/9/2026·by thelastaxolotl·commondreams.org
27
points
Your Party and Greens set to capitulate to Zionists
[email protected]·3 comments·4/2/2026·by thelastaxolotl·thecanary.co
16
points
Here are four ways Zohran Mamdani can end financial support in New York City for Israeli settlements, and he must act soon
[email protected]·0 comments·1/23/2026·by thelastaxolotl·mondoweiss.net
12
points
‘This Rogue Agency Should Not Receive a Single Penny,’ Progressives Say of ICE as Trump Signs Funding Bill | Common Dreams
[email protected]·0 comments·2/4/2026·by thelastaxolotl·commondreams.org
6
points
2 Days Left to Vote for NYC-DSA Anti-War Working Group Leadership
[email protected]·0 comments·3/23/2026·by thelastaxolotl·socialisttribune.substack.com